The hunt for the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic has new leads. Researchers have recognized half a dozen animal species that might have handed SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus that causes COVID-19, to folks, by reanalysing genomes collected from an animal market in Wuhan, China1. The examine establishes the presence of animals and the virus on the market, though it doesn’t affirm whether or not the animals themselves have been contaminated with the virus.
Most of the earliest circumstances of COVID-19 have been linked to town’s Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, and so it grew to become a spotlight within the seek for the pandemic’s origin. The examine, revealed in Cell at this time, is the newest in a sequence of analyses of the market samples. The researchers argue that their reanalysis provides extra weight to the market being the location of the primary spillover occasions, wherein animals with the virus contaminated folks, sparking the pandemic. This expands on a preliminary evaluation on a subset of the China CDC information, which the identical group revealed in March 2023.
Nevertheless, the group’s conclusion differs from the first peer-reviewed evaluation of the info, revealed in Nature2 in April final 12 months, wherein a separate group additionally recognized a number of animals and the virus however concluded the position of the market within the pandemic’s origin was unclear.
The seek for how the pandemic started has been vastly controversial. Most researchers say the virus originated in bats who contaminated folks, likely by way of an intermediate animal, as has occurred with different pathogens which have emerged in people. However a scarcity of robust proof for an intermediate host has led some researchers to argue that the virus might have escaped — intentionally or by chance — from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Market stalls
The genomic information used within the Cell, Nature and different analyses have been collected by researchers on the Chinese language Middle for Illness Management and Prevention (China CDC) shortly after the market was shut down on 1 January 2020. Over a number of weeks, China CDC employees visited the market many occasions to swab stalls, garbage bins, bathrooms, sewage, stray animals and deserted frozen animal merchandise. The samples contained plenty of DNA and RNA from a number of sources that researchers needed to sequence and sift by way of.
“It’s one of the vital information units on the early pandemic and on the origin of SARS-CoV-2,” says Florence Débarre, an evolutionary biologist on the the French nationwide analysis company CNRS, and co-author of the Cell evaluation.
When researchers on the China CDC revealed their evaluation in Nature final April, they reported samples that contained SARS-CoV-2 and got here from wild animals out there, most noteably raccoon canine (Nyctereutes procyonoides), that are prone to SARS-CoV-2 and may unfold the virus to different animals. However the group famous that there was no method to set up that the animals have been contaminated with SARS-CoV-2. Even when they have been contaminated, they may have caught the an infection from an individual who introduced the virus to the market, which leaves open the chance that the market was not the location of the pandemic’s emergence.
New methods
The most recent examine used more-sophisticated genomic methods to determine species represented within the samples, together with half a dozen animals the group say are potential intermediate hosts of SARS-Cov-2. The probably hosts embody raccoon canine and masked palm civet (Paguma larvata), which additionally could be prone to the virus. Different potential hosts embody hoary bamboo rats (Rhizomys pruinosus), Amur hedgehog (Erinaceus amurensis) and the Malayan porcupine (Hystrix brachyura), however it’s unclear whether or not these animals can catch SARS-CoV-2 and unfold the an infection. The group say the Reeves’s muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) and the Himalayan marmot (Marmota himalayana) is also carriers, however are much less doubtless than the opposite species.
The co-location of viral and animal genetic materials is “strongly suggestive” that the animals have been contaminated, says Gigi Gronvall, a biosecurity specialist at Johns Hopkins College in Baltimore, Maryland. “I used to be fairly amazed by what number of animals have been there,” she says.
Bats, from which the progenitor of SARS-CoV-2 most likely originated, weren’t detected within the genetic information. The shortage of bat DNA is unsurprising, says Alice Hughes, a conservation biologist on the College of Hong Kong who research bats and the wildlife commerce. Though bats are generally eaten in southern China, they don’t seem to be usually offered within the nation’s markets.
The authors of the Cell examine additionally argue that the viral variety current out there suggests it was the location of the pandemic’s emergence. Specifically, they are saying the presence of two SARS-CoV-2 lineages — often called A and B — circulating out there means that the virus jumped twice from animals to folks. The researchers conclude that, though it’s potential that contaminated people introduced the virus to the market on two separate events, that could be a a lot much less doubtless situation than the virus leaping twice from animals, particularly since their evaluation suggests that only a few folks would have been contaminated at that time and it’s unlikely that one individual seeded each lineages. “It actually simply matches this ongoing an infection in animal populations that spilled over a number of occasions to folks,” says Gronvall.
Nature’s information group reached out to the authors of the Nature paper, asking them concerning the outcomes and conclusions of the newest examine, however didn’t obtain a reply earlier than deadline.
Southern China
The most recent examine additionally means that the raccoon canine on the Huanan market have been most likely extra intently associated to wild raccoon canine collected at different markets in the identical province, and never as intently associated to farmed animals present in northern Chinese language provinces, suggesting they may have originated from central or southern China. The closest-known family of SARS-CoV-2 have been remoted from bats in southern China, Laos and different international locations in southeast Asia.
The following step could be to observe a few of these leads by learning animals within the wildlife commerce, says examine co-author Joshua Levy, an utilized mathematician on the Scripps Analysis Institute in La Jolla, California. The paper gives actionable details about forestall future spillovers, he says, similar to by monitoring down stallholders and testing animals for viruses intently associated to SARS-CoV-2, in addition to conducting research on the susceptibility of the wild mammals discovered on the market to SARS-CoV-2, and whether or not these animals can readily transmit the virus.
For Hughes, the findings reveal that the wildlife commerce must be higher regulated to attenuate the danger of pathogen unfold.