Join Chalkbeat Philadelphia’s free publication to maintain up with town’s public college system.
On the eve of Election Day, JD Vance and Tim Walz engaged in a hard-hitting debate about a variety of points, from abortion to inexpensive well being care to housing.
Requested about abortion, Vance shied away from a direct reply, saying, “There are loads of completely different opinions on abortion, and that’s okay. That’s what we would like. We would like disagreement in our nation.”
Walz shot again: “JD Vance thinks the state legislature is aware of extra a couple of lady’s physique than she does. This exhibits he doesn’t belief you with your individual physique, and if he doesn’t belief you, you possibly can’t belief him.”
On this debate, the vice presidential candidates have been truly college students, and the trade came about at Philadelphia’s J.R. Masterman Laboratory and Demonstration Faculty – the district’s most selective and one which at all times exhibits up close to the highest of “greatest excessive faculties in America” lists.
When it was completed, the few hundred college students in attendance forged their votes in a straw ballot.
Extra about that later.
The mock debate held Monday morning culminated a weekslong course of – and a decadeslong custom. Steven Gilligan’s Superior Placement authorities college students divided up into camps roughly at random, selected who would characterize the candidates, researched their positions, and lobbied their classmates. Gilligan, a social research instructor, has been doing this train for elections since 1998, and never simply these for president however for mayor, congress, senator, governor, and even district legal professional.
Ray Eggerts, who portrayed Democrat Tim Walz, and Sarah Zdancewic, as Republican JD Vance, debated for an hour earlier than a number of hundred schoolmates, protecting nearly each concern of significance within the marketing campaign. They answered refined questions developed by the AP authorities college students on 10 matters together with inflation, tariffs, international coverage, drug trafficking, local weather change, the disaster on the border and the inflow of fentanyl into the U.S, disinformation and free speech, abortion, housing costs, and inexpensive well being care.
Not like in some exchanges between the precise candidates, there have been few platitudes or superficialities right here.
One back-and-forth between the scholar debaters, on housing and Kamala Harris’ proposal to provide $25,000 to first-time house consumers, went like this:
“Minnesota, the state that I lead, is primary relating to millennial house possession,” stated Eggerts as Walz. “The answer to the housing disaster is for the federal authorities to assist individuals and development firms make first time properties for individuals, proper? The extra homes we’ve got, the extra the price goes down.”
Responded Zdancewic as Vance: “While you give individuals $25,000 when shopping for a home, it isn’t truly going to lower the price, however make the vendor enhance their costs.”
On the problem of free speech, Eggerts stated whereas it’s essential and within the Structure, it’s harmful to depart “unchecked” disinformation that results in denials of previous election outcomes or “an assault on the Capitol or violence in opposition to immigrants.”
Zdancewic countered: “It issues me that you just’re saying that individuals needs to be prevented from saying the issues that they consider simply since you disagree with it.”
Gilligan determined the mock debate would concentrate on the vice presidential candidates relatively than former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris. Having a scholar attempt to painting Trump would have been too distracting, he stated. He didn’t wish to put anybody within the place of presenting what may very well be interpreted as a caricature.
“We wished to get past personalities and concentrate on the problems,” he stated. “We noticed that each candidates appeared cheap within the vice presidential debate and that it was extra refined.”
College students have been diligent of their analysis, Gilligan stated, however not many volunteered to truly play the candidates. Eggerts acquired Walz, and Zdancewic acquired Vance, primarily based on a coin flip.
Over the quarter-century he has been doing this, race and gender by no means mattered in selecting which college students would play the candidates, Gilligan stated. “Throughout the debate between Clinton and Obama in 2008 [during the Democratic primary], Hillary was a boy and Obama was a woman,” Gilligan stated.
Each Eggerts, who lives in Northern Liberties, and Zdancewic, from College Metropolis, stated that their very own private views have been secondary to making an attempt to grasp and grasp the positions of their assigned candidates.
Nonetheless, “it’s an fascinating train to characterize somebody you disagree with,” stated Zdancewic. Diving into the coverage debate and attempting to rationalize the positions gave her a deeper understanding of points, she stated.
Eggerts stated that he principally agreed with Walz, however he additionally had some variations with him, together with on the Israel-Hamas conflict and local weather change. He additionally stated he wished the Harris-Walz ticket would get firmly behind Medicare for all.
“Actually, I lean extra left than Walz,” he stated.
The 2 groups additionally ready brief marketing campaign adverts. The one for Walz leaned closely on the “Coach Walz” dynamic, with him working on a soccer discipline, whereas the advert for Vance was all about being a statesman.
Of their closing statements on the debate, the 2 college students acquired inventive with alliteration. “Irrespective of the problem you care about, Harris-Walz are those with the best coverage … When compassion calls, vote Tim Walz, when freedom calls, vote Tim Walz, when progress calls, vote Tim Walz,” Eggerts declared.
Invoking inflation, the border, and medicines, Zdancewic stated, “I implore you, take the best stance, vote for yourselves, vote for JD Vance.”
The Masterman marketing campaign and mock debate is the final vestige of a Scholar Voices program funded by the Annenberg Middle for Public Coverage, which began within the Nineteen Nineties and was designed to get extra younger individuals engaged in public coverage and present points.
After the talk, college students voted in a straw ballot, and 74% went for Walz, Gilligan stated. Some college students, nonetheless, stated that how they voted didn’t essentially replicate their actual views, however relatively whether or not they or their mates labored on the Walz or Vance groups.
Regardless of all of their analysis, neither Eggerts nor Zdancewic, who’re each 17 years previous, can vote Tuesday. Each stated they have been disenchanted by that.
“I want I may,” stated Zdancewic. “I’m actually upset I can’t.”
Dale Mezzacappa is a senior author for Chalkbeat Philadelphia, the place she covers Okay-12 faculties and early childhood schooling in Philadelphia. Contact Dale at dmezzacappa@chalkbeat.org.
