WEAK EVIDENCE In dismissing the case towards former Sen. Juan Ponce Enrile, the antigraft courtroom famous that not one of the prosecution witnesses testified that they handed the alleged pork barrel kickbacks on to the accused. —KATHLEEN DE VILLA
The Sandiganbayan on Friday threw out the P172.8-million plunder case towards Juan Ponce Enrile, saying the prosecution submitted inadequate proof and failed to point out that the kickbacks he allegedly obtained from his pork barrel when he was a senator reached the minimal P50-million threshold for the crime.
“I knew all alongside that I’ll be acquitted as a result of I haven’t accomplished something,” stated the 100-year-old politician who now serves as authorized counsel for President Marcos after a listening to the place the courtroom introduced his exoneration.
The antigraft courtroom additionally acquitted his former chief of employees Jessica Lucila “Gigi” Reyes and businesswoman Janet Lim-Napoles, the alleged mastermind of the rip-off to siphon off P10 billion from the now-defunct Precedence Improvement Help Fund (PDAF) of the Senate and the Home of Representatives.
The PDAF scandal first got here to gentle in 2013 after the Inquirer uncovered the misuse of the fund allocations to lawmakers in ghost tasks for over 10 years. Below the scheme, the funds have been taken from the legislators’ pork barrels and funneled to bogus nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) or foundations run by Napoles.
Enrile, Reyes and Napoles have been charged in 2014 with plunder for allegedly amassing P172.8 million in kickbacks or commissions from the previous Senate president’s pork barrel from 2004 to 2010.
Article continues after this commercial
The prosecution’s “failure to show their guilt past affordable doubt” had moved the antigraft courtroom to grant the separate demurrers to proof filed by Enrile and Napoles.
Article continues after this commercial
Mission price ‘share’
A demurrer is sought by respondents who imagine that the proof offered towards them in courtroom is weak. Granting this movement is equal to an acquittal.
The Sandiganbayan allowed Enrile to file his demurrer in September final 12 months. The courtroom, nonetheless, didn’t grant Reyes’ personal movement throughout the identical month, however finally acquitted her in its resolution.
In its ruling, the five-member Third Division of the Sandiganbayan stated that the indictment towards Enrile alleged that he or Reyes “repeatedly obtained” kickbacks or commissions from Napoles or her representatives “within the type of a share” of the price of the tasks to be funded from his PDAF.
“Nonetheless, not one of the prosecution witnesses testified that they handed or transferred cash to Enrile himself,” the courtroom stated.
One of many prosecution witnesses, Ruby Tuason, a former social secretary for ex-President Joseph Estrada, “confirmed” that she didn’t give any cash to Enrile, it added.
The courtroom took observe of the letters signed by Enrile requesting for fund releases in 2006, 2007 and 2010, but it surely additionally cited the testimony of an officer of the Senate’s legislative funds workplace that this was “ordinary process.”
‘Evil in itself’
It stated that Enrile’s “felony intention” must be clearly established, contemplating that plunder was “mala ni se (evil in itself).
“It have to be proven clearly and convincingly that in making the letter-requests, Enrile meant to obtain kickbacks or commissions in change for his endorsement of Napoles’ NGOs,” the courtroom stated.
“If the NGOs turned out to be spurious, then it ought to have been established that Enrile both participated within the faking of those NGOs, or knew on the time that he was making the letter-request that the NGOs have been bogus,” it identified.
The prosecution’s proof, it added, was “clearly wanting on these factors.”
It stated that of 24 entries amounting to P172.8 million in alleged kickbacks in a “abstract of rebates” recorded by rip-off whistleblower Benhur Luy, solely 10 have been obtained by Tuason.
‘Speculative, baseless’
Solely half of that, or 5 transactions, indicated in each day disbursement reviews (DDRs), have been supposedly disbursed to “Enrile,” “JPE” and a sure “Tanda” totaling P46.39 million. This quantity is under the P50-million threshold for the crime of plunder beneath Republic Act No. 7080.
The deliveries by Tuason to Reyes, supposedly meant for Enrile, have been additionally by no means detailed, the courtroom burdened.
It dismissed as “speculative and baseless” the accusation that Reyes “couldn’t have consummated the scheme with out (Enrile’s) understanding and indispensable cooperation by his covert acts.”
“It’s clear that Tuason’s testimony was inconclusive and inadequate to show with ethical certainty that Reyes obtained monies forming a part of Enrile’s PDAF or that the identical handed her hand,” the antigraft courtroom stated.
The courtroom additionally raised doubts in regards to the legitimacy of the DDRs retrieved from the exterior drive of Luy, who served as Napoles’ monetary officer.
“How can we deal with these unsigned DDRs as credible items of proof after they have been printed solely in 2013, however they allegedly confirmed transactions that occurred in 2004 to 2010 or after virtually 10 years reckoned from 2004?” the courtroom stated.
Receipt unproven
Concerning Napoles’ legal responsibility, the Sandiganbayan stated that Luy lacked proof to determine that the businesswoman had gotten a slice of Enrile’s pork barrel.
“For the reason that prosecution was unable to show the receipt of cash … by herein public officers Enrile and Reyes (the alleged primary plunderers), then Napoles couldn’t be discovered accountable for the offense charged for the reason that foundation of her indictment was conspiracy with the stated public officers,” the courtroom dominated.
Enrile’s lead protection counsel, the 94-year-old lawyer Estelito Mendoza, stated “it is a vindication for all of us.” Not like Enrile, who may nonetheless stand on his personal with some help, Mendoza was wheelchair-bound.
Longest-serving
“I hope the individuals who filed these instances towards us will look at their conscience,” Enrile stated in a weak voice after the Sandiganbayan handed down its ruling.
Enrile and Mendoza have been among the many longest-serving members of the Cupboard of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos Sr. Enrile served as protection secretary earlier than breaking away from the dictator in 1986 whereas Mendoza remained loyal to Marcos as his solicitor normal.
Napoles, who hesitated talking with the media earlier than she stepped exterior the courtroom, solely stated: “God is sweet!” She is going to stay on the Correctional Institute for Girls for her convictions on different PDAF-related fees.
Reyes refused to reply questions from reporters and went straight to the elevator in a rush to depart the courthouse. Enrile’s longtime aide was seen praying with a rosary simply earlier than the ruling was learn by lawyer Dennis Pulma, the division’s Govt Clerk of Courtroom.
The Sandiganbayan issued arrest warrants towards two different coaccused within the plunder case—Ronald Lim, Napoles’ nephew, and John Raymund de Asis, her driver-bodyguard. Each stay in hiding.
‘Variance rule’
The 85-page resolution was authored by Affiliate Justice Ronald Moreno, with the concurrence of Affiliate Justices Bernelito Fernandez, Geraldine Econg and Juliet Manalo-San Gaspar.
Sandiganbayan Presiding Justice Amparo Cabotaje-Tang, a member of the Fifth Division, gave a dissenting and concurring opinion, through which she voted to convict Reyes of 5 counts of direct bribery primarily based on the “variance” rule.
Below the Guidelines of Courtroom on Felony Process, the variance doctrine permits an accused to be convicted of a unique and lesser crime.
Cabotaje-Tang, nonetheless, agreed that Reyes, together with Enrile and Napoles, be cleared of plunder on account of lack of proof past affordable doubt.
Not but over
Enrile, Reyes and Napoles usually are not fully off the hook legally as they’re nonetheless dealing with 15 counts of graft together with greater than 40 different respondents for allegedly diverting the P172.8-million public fund.
In April, Enrile was allowed by the Sandiganbayan to file a movement for the outright dismissal of his graft case. His lawyer Jecko Bello, nonetheless, selected to file a demurrer to proof with out depart of courtroom.
This movement signifies that he desires to skip the presentation of witnesses and proceed with the decision of his case on grounds that the prosecution’s proof towards him is inadequate.
If the courtroom grants Enrile’s demurrer to proof, he could be acquitted once more. However whether it is thrown out, the trial hearings will proceed.
Bail granted on account of age
After his arrest in 2014, Enrile was detained on the Philippine Nationwide Police Common Hospital. In August 2015, the Supreme Courtroom granted him bail, citing his superior age and poor well being.
Two different senators—Jinggoy Estrada and Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr.—have been additionally arrested and detained in 2014 on plunder fees.
Each Revilla and Estrada have been acquitted of plunder, however Estrada was convicted of the much less severe offenses of direct and oblique bribery in January, a call the Sandiganbayan reversed in August.
Your subscription couldn’t be saved. Please attempt once more.
Your subscription has been profitable.
Revilla was additionally accused of 16 counts of graft for allegedly amassing P224.5 million in kickbacks. He was acquitted in July 2021. —WITH A REPORT FROM INQUIRER RESEARCH INQ
